Rise in press freedom ranking but ‘could do better’

Let’s start with the good news: New Zealand has risen three places in the World Press Freedom Index and has the highest ranking of any Commonwealth country. It now sits at 16th.

The latest index was released on World Press Freedom Day on Saturday.

Last year Canada was five places ahead of us. This year it is five places behind, pulled down particularly by coverage of indigenous rights protests which has seen journalists arrested. We continue to outrank the United Kingdom by four places. Our neighbour across the Tasman continues to lag well behind – weighed down by the concentrated ownership of its media. However, Australia has improved by 10 places and has risen from 39th to 29th.

The top of the index continues to be dominated by countries in Northern Europe: Norway, Estonia, Netherlands., Sweden, Finland, and Denmark again fill the first six places.

Last year, the United States had dropped ten places to 55th in the face of public distrust and official antagonism. Many may have been surprised to see it is now down only two more places to 57th. The reason is simple: The index reflects activity in the previous January to December year.  The open assaults on media and challenges to the Constitution by the Trump Administration had yet to register. Expect next year’s ranking to plummet.

Conditions for journalism are poor in half of the world’s countries and, for the first time in the index’s 23-year history, the global state of press freedom is now classified as a “difficult situation” – only one place above the bottom.

The index measures five main indicators: Political, social, legal, economic, and security. Its authors, Reporters Without Borders (RSF), say economic pressures are proving a major – yet often underestimated – factor in seriously weakening the media. And here is where New Zealand’s good news ends. New Zealand is picked out as one of the countries adversely impacted by media shutdowns.

Reading the country-by-country analysis it appears New Zealand owes its rise in the ranks more to the deterioration of other nation’s media freedoms than improvements in our own position. Continue reading “Rise in press freedom ranking but ‘could do better’” →

There is a well-worn pattern to Winnie on the warpath

I fully expect New Zealand First leader Winston Peters to gaslight more journalists and make more chilling threats against news organisations over the coming months. He acts like he is gearing up early for a general election.

His fractious exchange with Corin Dann – who he labelled an “arrogant wokester loser” via social media –  on Morning Report last Wednesday was far from novel. It was classic piece of political gamesmanship that drew on a very, very long tradition of shooting the messenger. Nor was Peters’ veiled threat against RNZ’s finances particularly novel.

As far back as the eighteenth century journalists were being targeted. Edmund Burke is reputed to have given us the title the Fourth Estate but is also (less reliably) credited with the following: “Political journalists defy the laws of nature: They are both scum and dregs.” American Founding Father Thomas Jefferson said he would prefer newspapers without government to government without newspapers. However, he also compared journalists to carrion crow feeding off “the agonies of their victims, as wolves do on the blood of lambs”.

Patrick Day, in The Making of the New Zealand Press, stated that initially journalism in this country was held in higher regard than in Britain – in spite of the fact that the press here was based on English traditions. A century later, however, things had changed. Keith Holyoake used off-camera intimidation to try to cow interviewers but it was one of his successors who began the unhappy tradition of denigrating (on-air) reporters who ask awkward questions. It became a set piece for that extraordinarily complex character, Robert Muldoon.

Muldoon’s 1976 altercation with television reporter Simon Walker on Tonight looks like the template that Peters all-too-regularly uses to derail awkward interviewers. The interview involved presenting the then Prime Minister with a series of awkward facts that called into question his recent “The Russians Are Coming” warning on Soviet ship movements (which followed the Dancing Cossacks commercial that helped to get him elected in 1975). Muldoon questioned the right to put the questions and lambasted the “smart alec interviewer”. You can view that interview here. It has a familiar ring that belies the fact it is almost fifty years old. Continue reading “There is a well-worn pattern to Winnie on the warpath” →

Legion of wake-up calls embedded in news trust report

I shudder at the sheer horror of it all!

There we were: Stuck in a remote part of East Cape with no cellphone coverage, no satellite tv feed, and a radio that did no more an emit an angry hiss.

We were victims of news deprivation – a cruel form of externally imposed news avoidance.

I know that some people would relish the thought of finding themselves in a news blackout but, like people suddenly deprived of their daily tonnage of caffeine, we get withdrawal symptoms if we are deprived of the news media’s daily version of reality.

The fact you are reading this commentary confirms that we did survive the ordeal. Our travels took us further down the East Coast of the North Island and normal services were resumed. Now we are back home.

Our personal news desert meant I did not see or hear coverage of JMaD’s 2025 Trust in News report until I was reintroduced to my computer (any attempt to take it on holiday would have had unfortunate consequences).

I was pleased to see a slight drop in the number who sometimes avoid the news – down from 75 per cent to 73 per cent. I now know what they are missing. Continue reading “Legion of wake-up calls embedded in news trust report” →