While searching the labyrinth known as “Documents” on my computer, I came across this paper that I wrote in 2016 as a sort of aide memoire for a presentation I gave to the Broadcasting Standards Authority on the subject of ‘offence’. It still has relevance in the current discussion on harmful online content.
Category: Articles
News values from an audience perspective: A review
A review I wrote of News Values from an Audience Perspective, edited by Martina Temmerman and Belle Mast has been published in the Australian Journalism Review. The book is a very useful analysis of the values applied to news stories and the increasing role that audiences play in that process. Unfortunately you will need access the review through, for example, a university library account or by payment. Such are the stricture of copyright. https://www.intellectbooks.com/australian-journalism-review
Media dimensions in sentencing the Christchurch mosque attacker
The final two parts of a New Zealand Law Journal paper on the planning around media coverage of the sentencing of Christchurch terrorist Brenton Harrison Tarrant can now be published here.
The study, which I co-authored with Dr Denis Muller of Melbourne University, examined the extensive efforts that went into preserving fair trial rights while preventing victims being retraumatised and the court becoming a stage for white supremacist rhetoric.
It found the efforts of the court, officials, experts, and the media were groundbreaking and offer valuable lessons for how the justice system and the media deal with violent extremists.
The first two parts have already been made available on the website but, for convenience, all four parts are set out below.
Justice, the media, and the Christchurch mosque terrorist Part 1
Justice, the media, and the Christchurch mosque terrorist Part 2
Justice, the media, and the Christchurch mosque terrorist Part 3
Justice, the media, and the Christchurch mosque terrorist Part 4
Planning in fine detail for the Christchurch mosque terrorist’s court appearance
The man accused of the Christchurch mosque attacks initially pleaded not guilty to all charges. What followed was an extraordinary level of planning by the judiciary, court officials, security services, and a wide range of interests including the media.
Fair trial rights had to be balanced with a need to avoid re-traumatising victims, their families, and the wider community. There was also a determination to prevent the court becoming a stage for white extremist propaganda.
The accused changed his plea but the imperatives in the planning did not change. His sentencing hearing was conducted with unprecedented levels of control over media coverage.
In the second part of a paper, co-authored with Dr Denis Muller of Melbourne University and published by the New Zealand Law Journal, we detail the pre-trial planning, the efforts to keep victims and families informed, and the part played by media executives.
The paper has been subject to a six-month copyright stand-down period required by the New Zealand Law Journal’s publisher. Part 1 was posted here at the beginning of February. Part 2 can be accessed below. The remaining parts will be posted on The Knightly Views at the beginning of April and May.
Justice, the media, and the Christchurch mosque terrorist Part 2