Tar from Trump’s brush could splatter NZ media

Do not look upon incoming President Donald Trump’s widely anticipated assault on the American media with sympathetic detachment. Watch, instead, the way our own media systematically becomes spattered with tar from the same brush.

Attitudes are no longer formed solely from domestic influences. The Internet has not only broken down national information boundaries: It has removed the distinction altogether.

For those who receive most – or all – of their news through social media, the source has become either irrelevant or undefined. As a result, attitudes toward journalists and the institutions in which they work have become as transnational as the platforms from which the viewpoints are formed.

Yes, it’s early days but virtually all of the alarm over Trump’s well-signalled assault on press freedom is being directed at how he will make life very difficult for United States media. It has led to expressions of deep sympathy from abroad for American journalists and a collective exclamation: “Thank God we don’t live there’. Continue reading “Tar from Trump’s brush could splatter NZ media”

Issues of avoidance: Bomb threats…or news in general

 

Our news media had a tough call to make over the weekend on whether or not to report a bomb threat. Did they get it right?

The incident in question related to a trans-Tasman Air New Zealand flight from Wellington that was held on the tarmac at Sydney Airport for an hour over what a passenger described as “a bomb threat”.

Radio New Zealand reported the incident as a bomb threat (after Australian media first did so) and the RNZ report was reproduced by other New Zealand media including NZME, Stuff, and TVNZ. OneNews carried a report on its 6pm bulletin that made no mention of bomb threats but the TVNZ website continued to run with the RNZ story.

The RNZ story quoted a passenger on the flight, who said that the pilot had reported “a slight problem” but 10 minutes later another passenger showed her a news report saying there was a bomb threat. The passenger went on to state the reaction of passengers and offered a theory on the threat: “There may have been a note on the plane – that is what caused this – so we all sort of gathered the note had been picked up on the plane.”

For its part, Air New Zealand simply issued a statement saying it was aware of “a security incident” on the flight and that “standard security protocols” were followed.

There was a delay of about an hour in disembarking and processing the passengers, and the return flight was cancelled. However, the operations of the airport do not appear to have been otherwise affected.

The question is: Should the incident have been reported as a bomb threat? Continue reading “Issues of avoidance: Bomb threats…or news in general”

NZ media’s lab test results spell bad news

Three primary indicators of the health of New Zealand news media will be published this week and, if the first is anything to go by, the industry needs to be moved to the Intensive Care Unit.

AUT’s JM&D Trust in News Survey, the Acumen Edelman Trust Barometer, and the annual breakdown of advertising spend by the Advertising Standards Authority are all due this week.

The JM&D report – based on methodology developed by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at Oxford University for its survey of global trust – was released yesterday (two days early). It shows overall trust in news has dropped dramatically in the past year.

Two-thirds of people do not trust the news. Surely to God that sends a message to all mainstream, media that their approach to journalism has to change.

The overall level of trust has dropped by a staggering 38 per cent in the five years the AUT study has been carried out. Even trust in the news people use has declined by more than 27 per cent since 2020 and now fewer than half of us trust those sources.

We now rank alongside the UK in the low proportion of people who trust most news most of the time. Only the United States posted lower rates.

We also ranked highest in news avoidance in a comparison with the Reuters international survey. In New Zealand, three-quarters actively avoid the news to some extent.  Greece ranks next with about 58 per cent and the international average sits below 40 per cent. Continue reading “NZ media’s lab test results spell bad news”

News avoidance and lack of trust MUST send a message to media

More than two-thirds of New Zealanders actively avoid news coverage and more than one in ten do so regularly.

Findings released this morning by AUT’s JM&D journalism research centre make sober reading. Its latest Trust in News report shows Kiwis are avoiding the news because they think it is depressing and biased.

In its 2023 survey, which is based on an international study by the Reuters Institute at Oxford University, JM&D asked for the first time about news avoidance and political influence. It used Horizon Research to conduct a nationwide online survey of 1120 adults in February.

Sixty nine per cent said they sometimes or often avoided the news. That is a statistic that sits well above the Reuters Institute’s multi-nation findings. That study found 54 per cent of Brazilians avoided news, followed by 46 per cent in the United Kingdom, 42 per cent in the United States and 41 per cent in Australia. At the bottom of the avoidance table were Japan (12 per cent) and Finland (20 per cent).

At the other end of spectrum, New Zealand’s international ranking of those ‘highly interested’ in news was equally alarming. Little more than a third expressed a strong focus, compared to more than two-thirds of Finland’s population. Continue reading “News avoidance and lack of trust MUST send a message to media”