Kensington Palace’s family snap did the world a great service

It was one hell of a way to do it, but Kensington Palace did society a huge favour by releasing a digitally altered photograph of the Princess of Wales and her children.

The photograph – distributed then withdrawn by picture agencies around the world – may have finally brought home to the general public the fact that they can no longer take ‘reality’ for granted. And it sent a message to the media-knocking public that charges should not always be laid at the feet of journalists.

The amateurish nature of the manipulation (I doubt the palace has the latest version of Photoshop) made it easy for the public to see that the picture of the family had been altered. Poor Prince Louis appears to have had a terrible accident to his right hand. Princess Charlotte’s wrist appears to have suffered a nasty sideways fracture. And shock, horror: Kate’s wedding ring seems to be missing. Continue reading “Kensington Palace’s family snap did the world a great service”

Generative AI: Be afraid, be very afraid

We humans have always had a bit of a penchant for futile exercises.

The ancient Greeks had a death-defying king rolling a large boulder up a hill for eternity. Much later, the Japanese invented an infuriating game called Whac-a Mole.

Now the media are trying to stay a step ahead of generative artificial intelligence.

Media companies around the world are grappling with editorial guidelines to deal with a digital phenomenon that can be both a tool to enhance their productivity, and an insidious weapon that can be used against them.

Some see it as an existential threat that should be banned outright but, really, artificial intelligence is like firearms and opioids – useful in the right hands but extraordinarily dangerous in the wrong ones. And, like drugs, its legitimate use needs to be carefully prescribed. Continue reading “Generative AI: Be afraid, be very afraid”