Comedian’s press conference gatecrash no laughing matter

Guy Williams’ gatecrashing of the ACT leader David Seymour’s press conference at Waitangi was not funny, not justified, and not acceptable.

It debased the role of bona fide journalists and, worse, it was signal to every grandstander and malcontent that stand-up press conferences represent an ideal soapbox that is there for the taking.

In spite of his self-description as a “volunteer journalist”, Williams is not a journalist. He is a comedian and presenter. The closest he gets to the news is in lampooning current events. In short, he had no place there.

At Waitangi, David Seymour – rightly the focus of attention over his divisive Treaty Principles Bill – was holding an outdoors press conference with a large gathering of journalists when Williams interjected.

Microphone in hand and no doubt being videoed for his New Zealand Today show, Williams threw vitriol rather than questions at the ACT leader. He accused Seymour of spreading misinformation and “spinning shit” before obliquely casting doubt on the honesty of modern politicians. The only question Williams actually appeared to ask was whether Seymour was joking when he said he was improving the mana of the Treaty.

Seymour made light of the encounter and – smile on face – counterpunched with his opinion of Williams’ comedic skills.

It could all have been dismissed as a bit of silliness on the part of an entertainer looking to get a rise out of a politician. On the surface, that is exactly what it was. I have no doubt the footage, complete with Williams’ additional tuppence worth, will wind up in his show.

However, there is a deeper issue arising from the comedian’s antics: He violated an environment in which journalists collectively hold power to account by questioning those that hold that power. Continue reading “Comedian’s press conference gatecrash no laughing matter”

Cynical politics reported on world stage damage our reputation

‘Flashpoint’ in a foreign news story usually brings to mind the Middle East or the border between North and South Korea. It is not a term usually associated with New Zealand but last week it was there in headline type.

News outlets around the world carried reports of the hikoi and protests against Act’s Treaty Principles Bill, with the overwhelming majority characterising the events as a serious deterioration in this country’s race relations.

The Associated Press report carried the headline “New Zealand’s founding treaty is at a flashpoint: Why are thousands protesting for Māori rights?”. That headline was replicated by press and broadcasting outlets across America, by Yahoo, by MSN, by X, by Voice of America, and by news organisations in Asia and Europe.

Reuters’ story on the hikoi carried the headline: “Tens of thousands rally at New Zealand parliament against bill to alter indigenous rights”. That report also went around the world. So, too, did the BBC, which reaches 300 million households worldwide: “Thousands flock to NZ capital in huge Māori protest”.

The Daily Mail’s website is given to headlines as long as one of Tolstoy’s novels and told the story in large type: “Tens of thousands of Māori protesters march in one of New Zealand’s biggest ever demonstrations over proposed bill that will strip them of ‘special rights’”. The Economist put it more succinctly: “Racial tensions boil over in New Zealand”.

In the majority of cases, the story itself made clear the Bill would not proceed into law but how many will recall more than the headline? Continue reading “Cynical politics reported on world stage damage our reputation”