There is a glimmer of good news for all those bright, talented creatives in the advertising industry who think artificial intelligence is going to steal their jobs.
A study by Australia’s Monash University on behalf of the advertising agency TBWA has found that human creative concepts always outperform generative AI creations.
Does that mean that Liz from Kerikeri should not have bothered handing over her biometric data to become the cloned frontwoman of those Skinny mobile tv commercials that proudly proclaim to be made with the help of AI? No, because the irritatingly obvious creations were the brainchild of real people and the use of AI was trumpeted by Skinny and its parent company Spark as a clever marketing ploy.
The Australian study was aimed at testing whether artificial intelligence could, in fact, replace creatives in dreaming up advertising ideas and slogans. The finding: AI consistently fails at creativity.
The Monash researchers took 1000 creative advertising campaigns and fed them into large language models (LLMs) that were first asked to strip the advertising messages down to single sentences. The cunning academics then fed the single sentence into the AI machines and asked them to create advertising campaigns.
TBWA Sydney chief creative officer Matt Keon told The Australian that the LLMs had quickly removed all of the creative elements while reducing the campaigns to single sentences and then consistently failed to produce such elements in their recreations of the campaigns. Continue reading “Good reasons why Skinny’s clone Liz needed more than AI”
