An arid outlook for local media and local democracy

New Zealand is about to feel the widespread effect of one of the consequences of media climate change – news deserts.

NZME’s announcement last week that it is “proposing” to close 14 of its community newspapers – that is a nice way of saying it has already decided to do so – will leave gaping holes in local reporting. Journalists, whose sole task is to tell people what is happening in their small communities, will lose their jobs.

The story, reported with uncharacteristic frankness (about itself) by the New Zealand Herald, also mentioned that the announcement came on the heels of major cuts this year by TV3 and TVNZ.

There is, however, a significant difference. TV3 contracted Stuff to fill the hole it created by closing Newshub, and TVNZ has sufficient means to cover news and current affairs even if it does so in reduced form. Once the NZME community titles go, residents will be deprived of vital links to information.

The Herald’s Shayne Currie, made no bones about it. He described the closures as “a body blow to local news in many New Zealand regions”, adding: “In some regions, these titles are the only source of local news, covering their local councils and other public bodies.” Continue reading “An arid outlook for local media and local democracy” →

Tar from Trump’s brush could splatter NZ media

Do not look upon incoming President Donald Trump’s widely anticipated assault on the American media with sympathetic detachment. Watch, instead, the way our own media systematically becomes spattered with tar from the same brush.

Attitudes are no longer formed solely from domestic influences. The Internet has not only broken down national information boundaries: It has removed the distinction altogether.

For those who receive most – or all – of their news through social media, the source has become either irrelevant or undefined. As a result, attitudes toward journalists and the institutions in which they work have become as transnational as the platforms from which the viewpoints are formed.

Yes, it’s early days but virtually all of the alarm over Trump’s well-signalled assault on press freedom is being directed at how he will make life very difficult for United States media. It has led to expressions of deep sympathy from abroad for American journalists and a collective exclamation: “Thank God we don’t live there’. Continue reading “Tar from Trump’s brush could splatter NZ media” →

What hazards lie ahead for America’s media?

Donald Trump’s decisive victory in the US presidential election led to a flurry of analysis and prediction today. Among the thought-provoking articles was this, published by the Columbia Journalism Review. Journalism under siege means democracy itself is under siege. You can read Kyle Paoletta’s article HERE.

A day to be gripped by fear

This morning, I am afraid. I am very afraid.

I fear that by the time I go to bed democracy in the United States will be imperilled by a man, the nature of which the Founding Fathers could never envisage when creating the protective elements of the constitution.

The risks will not be to Americans alone. The world will become a different place if Donald J Trump once again becomes president.

My trepidation is tempered only by the fact that no-one can be sure he has the numbers to gain sufficient votes in the electoral college that those same founding fathers devised as a power-sharing devise between federal and state governments. They could not have foreseen how it could become the means by which a fraction of voters could determine their country’s future.

Or perhaps that is contributing to my disquiet. No-one has been able to give me the comfort of predicting a win by Kamala Harris.

In fact, none of the smart money has been ready to call it one way or the other. Continue reading “A day to be gripped by fear” →